Feminism in Argentina, 1876
excerpted from Maria Eugenia Echenique, "The Emancipation of
Women" (1876)
When emancipation was given to men, it was also given to women in recognition of the equality of rights,
consistent with the principles of nature on which they are founded, that proclaim the identity of soul between men
and women. Thus, Argentine women have been emancipated by law for a long time. The code of law that
governs us authorizes a widow to defend her rights in court, just as an educated woman can in North America,
and like her, we can manage the interests of our children, these rights being the basis for emancipation. What
we lack is sufficient education and instruction to make use of them, instruction that North American women have;
it is not just recently that we have proclaimed our freedom. To try to question or to oppose women's
emancipation is to oppose something that is almost a fact, it is to attack our laws and destroy the Republic.
So let the debate be there, on the true point where it should be: whether or not it is proper for women to make
use of those granted rights, asking as a consequence the authorization to go to the university so as to practice
those rights or make them effective. And this constitutes another right and duty in woman: a duty to accept the
role that our own laws bestow on her when extending the circle of her jurisdiction and which makes her
responsible before the members of her family.
This, assuming that the woman is a mother. But, are all women going to marry? Are all going to be relegated to
a life of inaction during their youth or while they remain single? Is it so easy for all women to look for a stranger to
defend their offended dignity, their belittled honor, their stolen interests? Don't we see every day how the laws
are trodden underfoot, and the victim, being a woman, is forced to bow her head because she does not know
how to defend herself, exposed to lies and tricks because she does not know the way to clarify the truth?
Far from causing the breakdown of the social classes, the emancipation of women would establish morality and
justice in them; men would have a brake that would halt the "imperious need" that they have made of the "lies
and tricks" of litigations, and the science of jurisprudence, so sacred and magnificent in itself but degenerated
today because of abuses, would return to its splendor and true objective once women take part in the forum.
Generous and abnegated by nature, women would teach men humanitarian principles and would condemn the
frenzy and insults that make a battlefield out of the courtroom.
"Women either resolve to drown the voice of their hearts, or they listen to that voice and renounce
emancipation." If emancipation is opposed to the tender sentiments, to the voice of the heart, then men who are
completely emancipated and study science are not capable of love. The beautiful and tender girl who gives her
heart to a doctor or to a scientist, gives it, then, to a stony man, incapable of appreciating it or responding to her;
women could not love emancipated men, because where women find love, men find it too; in both burns the
same heart's flame. I have seen that those who do not practice science, who do not know their duties or the
rights of women, who are ignorant, are the ones who abandon their wives, not the ones who, concentrated on
their studies and duties, barely have time to give them a caress.
Men as much as women are victims of the indifference that ignorance, not science, produces. Men are more
slaves of women who abuse the prestige of their weakness and become tyrants in their home, than of the
schooled and scientific women who understand their duties and are capable of something. With the former the
husband has to play the role of man and woman, because she ignores everything: she is not capable of
consoling nor helping her husband, she is not capable of giving tenderness, because, preoccupied with herself,
she becomes demanding, despotic, and vain, and she does not know how to make a happy home. For her
there are no responsibilities to carry out, only whims to satisfy. This is typical, we see it happening every day.
The ignorant woman, the one who voluntarily closes her heart to the sublime principles that provoke sweet
emotions in it and elevate the mind, revealing to men the deep secrets of the All-Powerful; the woman incapable
of helping her husband in great enterprises for fear of losing the prestige of her weakness and ignorance; the
woman who only aspires to get married and reproduce, and understands maternity as the only mission of women on earth--she can be the wife of a
savage, because in him she can satisfy all her aspirations and hopes, following that law of nature that operates
even on beasts and inanimate beings.
I would renounce and disown my sex if the mission of women were reduced only to procreation, yes, I would
renounce it; but the mission of women in the world is much more grandiose and sublime, it is more than the
beasts', it is the one of teaching humankind, and in order to teach it is necessary to know. A mother should know
science in order to inspire in her children great deeds and noble sentiments, making them feel superior to the
other objects in the universe, teaching them from the cradle to become familiar with great scenes of nature
where they should go to look for God and love Him. And nothing more sublime and ideal than the scientific
mother who, while her husband goes to cafes or to the political club to talk about state interests, she goes to
spend some of the evening at the astronomical observatory, with her children by the hand to show them Jupiter,
Venus, preparing in that way their tender hearts for the most legitimate and sublime aspirations that could
occupy men's minds. This sacred mission in the scientific mother who understands emancipation--the fulfillment
of which, far from causing the abandonment of the home, causes it to unite more closely--instead of causing
displeasure to her husband, she will cause his happiness.
The abilities of men are not so miserable that the carrying out of one responsibility would make it impossible to
carry out others. There is enough time and competence for cooking and mending, and a great soul such as that
of women, equal to that of their mates, born to embrace all the beauty that exists in Creation of divine origin and
end, should not be wasted all on seeing if the plates are clean and rocking the cradle.
|