AI Policy
You may use AI tools as research assistants and writing aids—to
find sources (verify them independently), improve clarity,
brainstorm ideas, or organize notes. However, AI cannot substitute
for your own critical thinking and analysis. The core principle:
when you submit work with your name on it, the ideas, arguments,
and analysis should be genuinely yours. Using AI to generate your
arguments or write substantial portions undermines the purpose of
your education—developing your ability to think critically about
political science and communicate effectively. Think of AI like a
research librarian: helpful for finding materials and refining
your work, but the intellectual labor of understanding, analyzing,
and arguing must be your own. If unsure about your AI use, ask:
"Am I still doing the thinking, or is the AI doing it for me?" You
are building skills that will serve you long after this course
ends.
Furthermore, the capacity for AI to write really nice sentences
about American Government means my grading will place great
emphasis on the things which AI cannot do well and reflect your
engagement in this course. While AI can write coherently on all
sorts of aspects of American government and political science, it
has quite clearly not been a student in this class and I
will therefore be placing great emphasis on your ability to
demonstrate you have learned concepts particular to/emphasized
within this particular class.
If you do use AI assistance in the writing of your assignment, I
would like you to indicate so, the tool, and the nature of the
assistance within you references. E.g., "ChatGPT: I used
ChatGPT to read over my paper and improve the overall writing
style. I asked it to help me create a basic organizational
structure for this assignment."
back to PS201 homepage